Published On: Thu, Apr 29th, 2010

Election 2010: Brighton’s voters explain their decision

Share This
Tags

This evening the leaders of the three main parties will have another shot at winning over the ‘floating voters’ with the third and final live TV debate.

However, some voters have already made their minds up and three of Brighton’s best known social media characters told News From Brighton why they have been convinced by the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats.

Conservatives

Andrew Hancox

http://twitter.com/andrewhancox

http://blog.andrewhancox.com/

I’ll be voting Conservative in this election because I strongly believe in both their ethos and policies. The ethos of the party for me is defined by three concepts:

Egalitarianism – people are entitled to universal equality of opportunity; this is an area that the party has an unjustifiably poor reputation on.

Personal responsibility – the government should not intrude in our lives more than necessary, people should be encouraged and empowered to put something back into society, this is reflected in the, admittedly buzzword heavy, Big Society policy package.

Pragmatism – there is space for idealism in politics but we live in a less than ideal world and policies need to reflect that; Bismarck described politics as the art of the possible, something we would do
well to remember.

There are two key policy packages I particularly support:

Conservatives acknowledge that we cannot entirely put the genie back in the bottle when it comes to energy use and that nuclear power is one of the key ways forward. Getting people in to jobs and keeping them there is the only way
we will weather and turn around the current economic situation and Conservative policies reflect this.

The Liberal Democrat policy of raising the minimum wage and the Labour policy to raise national insurance are superficially attractive but would cause a huge reduction in the number of entry level positions and cause large numbers of redundancies whilst drastically increasing the wage bill of the NHS and other public sector organisations.

Labour

Dan Wilson

http://twitter.com/wilsondan

http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/

I’m voting Labour in Brighton Pavilion because I believe that Nancy Platts is a compelling, principled candidate and, without doubt, the only woman in the race who actually gives a damn about Brighton.

Like my dad, I’m Brighton born and bred. For many years the town was badly served by absentee Tory MPs concerned with little more than their careersand the Conservative party. David Lepper changed that and has been a superb constituency MP since 1997.

In 2010 we have a race between an MEP who lives in Brussels, a Tory from London and Nancy Platts, who does actually live in the same country and city as the people she wants to represent. I want a powerful local voice in Parliament. Don’t you?

But local isn’t enough. Nancy is also refreshing because she’s not just another plastic, professional politician who puts party before principle and just does what she’s told. She opposes the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the renewal of Trident and ID cards. She backs electoral reform and has worked her life in proper jobs.

Labour hasn’t been perfect since 1997. But there’s plenty to shout about. Minimum wage, low unemployment, civil partnerships, New Deal, Sure Start, shiny new hospitals and schools, devolution, peace in Northern Ireland.

The choice in Brighton Pavilion is pretty clear and a close run race. I don’t really care what the bookies say: if you want a great local MP and don’t want a Conservative government, vote Labour. I’m a Nancy boy. Why aren’t you?

Liberal Democrats

Miles Cheverton:

http://twitter.com/thetalldesigner

http://www.thetalldesigner.com/

I’ve always been a liberal. I believe in personal responsibility, unfettered by excessive interference from government and that’s why I am voting Liberal Democrat.

No other party came out against the illegal war in Iraq. No other party has a sensible, education and evidence based approach to reducing drug use. The Lib Dems have pledged to repeal huge swathes of the Labour government’s authoritarian & draconian laws infringing upon our civil liberties.

I also passionately believe that our electoral system needs radically updating. Our current system is commonly referred to as “first past the post”. It is in fact quite possible that Labour could come third in terms of total number of votes, and yet win the number of seats they would require to control government. The Lib Dem’s have pledged to give us proportional representation which would give all parties, however small a voice, and would end the two sided power struggle between Labour and Tory.

Lastly – I believe that our media needs reform, the disgusting displays by the right wing and Rupert Murdoch press on the day of the second debate should be proof enough for anyone that the media think they control the election process, not us, the voters. Control of such influential media needs to be distributed amongst many people, with many opinions, not one, out of touch control freak.

Vote Liberal Democrat for Freedom, Democracy and a change from the politics that has brought us to our knees.

***

We’d love to hear from Green Party and UKIP supporters who want to tell the people the of Brighton and Hove why they support their political party. Write to us at contact@newsfrombrighton.co.uk

  • http://blog.andrewhancox.com/2010/04/andrew-hancox-web-opinioneer/ Angry of Hove » Blog Archive » Andrew Hancox – Web opinioneer

    [...] be voting in this election – the full article, which is well worth reading, is available here but those who don’t want their mind polluted by left wing views can read a defence of my [...]

  • R Whitehouse

    Dear News from Brighton,

    As a “floater voter” the UKIP manifesto has a radical viewpoint which does not snipe at other parties. Its main aim seems to be for the overall benefit of society, covering some of the comments already made regarding people’s voting choices, and not just offering ‘bribes’ to particular sections of the communities.

    UKIP covers a very wide range of issues, It appears to have at its heart public choices and democracy, rather than government rulings and transformation of bureaucracy and the unwieldy laws on laws. Current government aims can include “Claim whatever benefits you are entitled to”. Yes, at the cost of the taxpayer and the national debt. Surely we need to be aware of the good of all, rather than being self-centred?

    In their introduction UKIP suggests that we vote for common sense. Some of their issues appear quite controversial. However, UKIP does not appear to be advocating extremes, but rather moderation, on the principal that “What’s sauce for the goose is also sauce for the gander”. In a recent hustings one question was why all 10 fingers have to be printed. Terrorism, and the loss of limbs may well be one reason, do you think?

    UKIP manifesto lists vital services necessary for living. They should not be open to political manipulation, nor means tested, but serve the population as they need to do. They also reviewed government income and expenditure with positive suggestions for less taxation and more local government. UKIP also appears to have continually had the populace in view, and not their own pockets, nor scoring off other political parties and their shortcomings.

    Nor do we have democracy in the EU. If an MEP does not toe the EU line then they are quite seriously and undemocratically penalised, and not allowed their viewpoint to be weighed in the balance. We are supposed to be a democracy. So why are we selling our children and grandchildren short of the benefits which we have appreciated? The EU seemed a good idea, but the public of the time were not advised what the real issues were. This really does need to be rectified. UKIP offers to do so.
    Finally, it seems to me that the changes they advocate can only benefit us, even taking opposing views into consideration. However we vote we will eventually get exactly what we deserve. And sooner rather than later maybe?

  • R Whitehouse

    As a “floater voter” the UKIP manifesto has a radical viewpoint which does not snipe at other parties. Its main aim seems to be for the overall benefit of society, covering some of the comments already made regarding people’s voting choices, and not just offering ‘bribes’ to particular sections of the communities.

    UKIP covers a very wide range of issues. It appears to have at its heart public choices and democracy, rather than government rulings, transformation of bureaucracy and the unwieldy laws on laws. Current government aims can include “Claim whatever benefits you are entitled to”. Yes, at the cost of the taxpayer and the national debt. Surely we need to be aware of the good of all, rather than being self-centred?

    In their introduction UKIP suggests that we vote for common sense. Some of their issues appear quite controversial. However, UKIP does not appear to be advocating extremes, but rather moderation, on the principal that “What’s sauce for the goose is also sauce for the gander”. In a recent hustings one question was why all 10 fingers have to be printed. Terrorism, and the loss of limbs may well be one reason, do you think?

    UKIP manifesto lists vital services necessary for living. They should not be open to political manipulation, nor means tested, but serve the population as they need to do. They also reviewed government income and expenditure with positive suggestions for less taxation and more local government. UKIP also appears to have continually had the populace in view, and not their own pockets, nor scoring off other political parties and their shortcomings.

    Nor do we have democracy in the EU. If an MEP does not toe the EU line then they are quite seriously and undemocratically penalised, and not allowed their viewpoint to be weighed in the balance. We are supposed to be a democracy. So why are we selling our children and grandchildren short of the benefits which we have appreciated? The EU seemed a good idea, but the public of the time were not advised what the real issues were. This really does need to be rectified. UKIP offers to do so.
    Finally, it seems to me that the changes they advocate can only benefit us, even taking opposing views into consideration. However we vote we will eventually get exactly what we deserve. And sooner rather than later maybe?

Twitter Updates